Namespaces and DTDs

[Bill la Forge]

From: len bullard <cbullard at hiwaay.net>
>Darn.  Maybe LISP was the right language after all and forty years 
>of computer scientists just didn't "get it".


Lisp and XML have a few things in common, like being easy to
determine if they are well formed. Frankly, I think XML will be
better in the long run because it can be validated against various
schema.

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)