empty tags and the XMl 1.0 spec

Chris Maden crism at oreilly.com
Fri Mar 12 18:20:16 GMT 1999


[Elliotte Rusty Harold]
> "Empty-element tags may be used for any element which has no
> content, whether or not it is declared using the keyword EMPTY. For
> interoperability, the empty-element tag must be used, and can only
> be used, for elements which are declared EMPTY."
> 
> Is there any way out of this conundrum?

See the definition of "for interoperability" in §1.2.

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list