empty tags and the XMl 1.0 spec
paul at prescod.net
Fri Mar 12 18:57:17 GMT 1999
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> >From the XML spec, section 3.1:
> "Empty-element tags may be used for any element which has no content,
> whether or not it is declared using the keyword EMPTY. For
> interoperability, the empty-element tag must be used, and can only be
> used, for elements which are declared EMPTY."
> Is there any way out of this conundrum?
Yes, look at the definition for "interoperability." The paragraph above
says "If you want to be legal XML do this. If you want to be compatible
with old SGML tools also do this."
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
"The Excursion [Sport Utility Vehicle] is so large that it will come
equipped with adjustable pedals to fit smaller drivers and sensor
devices that warn the driver when he or she is about to back into a
Toyota or some other object." -- Dallas Morning News
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev