Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?

[Kay Michael]

> This would force the use of fully qualified names and create 
> name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing 
> the classes being used.

I'd vote for changing the package name rather than the class names because
package
names appear in fewer places in the code, and because few applications are
likely to
want to use the old classes and the new concurrently.

And I'd vote for sax2 rather than open-, mod-, ex- etc because (a) it's
obvious to everyone what it means, and (b) it avoids further debate when it
comes to sax3.

Mike Kay

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)