Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
Michael.Kay at icl.com
Mon Mar 15 10:53:50 GMT 1999
> This would force the use of fully qualified names and create
> name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing
> the classes being used.
I'd vote for changing the package name rather than the class names because
names appear in fewer places in the code, and because few applications are
want to use the old classes and the new concurrently.
And I'd vote for sax2 rather than open-, mod-, ex- etc because (a) it's
obvious to everyone what it means, and (b) it avoids further debate when it
comes to sax3.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev