SAX: Name Vote

[David Megginson]

NOTE: **PLEASE** reply by private e-mail

What: Vote for the name of the next generation of SAX
When: Until midnight (EST) Wednesday 17 March 1999
Where: By private e-mail to david at megginson.com

Bill la Forge writes:

 > Should we just stick with ModSAX/ModParser?
 > Should we change to OpenSAX/OpenParser?

OK, I'm going to act like a W3C committee chair instead of a hacker,
and decree that this is the question before us:

[Q] Which of the following namesets shall the next version of SAX use?

  a. ModSAX, ModParser, ModHandler, etc.
  b. OpenSAX, OpenParser, OpenHandler, etc.
  c. SAX2, Parser2, Handler2, etc.

Please vote clearly for only one of the alternatives -- ambiguous
votes will not be counted.

I will accept all e-mail votes up to midnight (EST) Wednesday 17 March
1999, will attempt to eliminate duplicates, then will tabulate and
post the results, including the name, address, and vote of each
participant.  

If none of the alternatives wins 50% + 1 of the votes, I will remove
the alternative with the lowest number of votes and then will repeat
this process with the remaining two alternatives.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)