RDF considered optional
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Wed Mar 17 22:23:20 GMT 1999
Jeffrey E. Sussna wrote:
> The RDF syntax spec states that "The RDF element is optional if the
> content can be known to be RDF from the application context."
> Can anyone clarify exactly what is meant by "application context"?
I take that to mean that if the application already knows it is
dealing with RDF, no RDF element is required. It's just a container
for the true RDF anyway.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev