Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?

[Paul Prescod]

"Stephen D. Williams" wrote:
> I'm not trying to create a new way to recognize XML, but a more efficient way to
> do all kinds of computer processing and communication with it.  Innordinate
> amounts of time, money, effort, CPU, and bandwidth are spent at the interfaces
> between programs and other programs, databases, file systems, networks, servers,
> etc.  XML is a good general solution, but some situations require optimization
> which is what I'm working on.

I can see many ways that a typical XML document could be optimized for
size if XML compatibility was not a concern. Call it "compressed ML." I am
not clear, however, why CompressedML would need to be binary. There are
many languages where working with binary data is more expensive than
working with text.

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"Perpetually obsolescing and thus losing all data and programs every 10
years (the current pattern) is no way to run an information economy or
a civilization." - Stewart Brand, founder of the Whole Earth Catalog
http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/10124.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)