RDF Question: attaching multiple types to a resource

[Roger L. Costello]

In an earlier posting it was clarified (to me) how a resource type
property could be used as the resource element, i.e.,

<rdf:Description [attrs]>
    <rdf:type resoure="foo">
    [other properties]
</rdf:Description>

can be equivalently expressed as:

<foo>
   [other properties]
</foo>

This morning I read in the RDF spec that you can associate multiple type
properties to a resource, e.g.,

<rdf:Description [attrs]>
    <rdf:type resoure="foo">
    <rdf:type resoure="bar">
    [other properties]
</rdf:Description>

If I wanted to create the alternate syntax as I did above, which type
would I migrate up?  Would the equivalent syntax be:

<foo>
    <rdf:type resoure="bar">
   [other properties]
</foo>

or 

<bar>
    <rdf:type resoure="foo">
   [other properties]
</bar>

or both?

I apologize for not stating my question very well.  I am at a loss for
the correct terminology.  What is the correct terminology for morphing
the syntax from:

<rdf:Description [attrs]>
    <rdf:type resoure="foo">
    [other properties]
</rdf:Description>

to:

<foo>
   [other properties]
</foo>

How about: "The type property has migrated up to resource element"? 
/Roger


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)