New schema spec

[Paul Prescod]

roddey at us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> Is
> there any way that such a system could be reasonably confirmed to be
> non-ambigious (and by reasonable I mean very fast and small amount of code.)
> And, given that, is there any way that it could be validated against in some
> less than exhaustive search way?

I haven't been completely through the schema spec yet, but let me ask you
two questions: what definition of ambiguity are you using and why do you
care? XML DTDs explicitly allow ambiguity in content models so why
wouldn't schemas?

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

And so, in one of history's little ironies, the global triumph of bad
software in the age of the PC was reversed by a surprising combination
of forces: the social transformation initiated by the network, a
long-discarded European theory of political economy, and a small band
of programmers throughout the world mobilized by a single simple idea. 
 - http://old.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)