John Cowan cowan at
Tue May 11 17:25:20 BST 1999

Ronald Bourret wrote:

> > I agree with Paul 100% on this one.  For precisely this reason, DDML
> > remained entity free for a very long time (though I got outvoted on
> > unparsed entities in the end.)
> As one of those who helped outvote Simon, I'd just like to say that I have
> completely recanted.  Including unparsed entity definitions in DDML was a
> mistake and I now regret it.

I remain unreconstructed.

If we are to have validatable ENTITY/ENTITIES attributes, then
we must have unparsed entity declarations as well.  Either
lose both or keep both, say I.

John Cowan		cowan at
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list