Letting well-formedness slip: was A milestone in XML

Marc.McDonald at Design-Intelligence.com Marc.McDonald at Design-Intelligence.com
Mon May 17 23:58:21 BST 1999


I put an option in my parser for the pre 1.0 XML style since some of the XML
examples on the net are in that style, the Shakespeare plays for instance.

Marc B McDonald
Principal Software Scientist
Design Intelligence, Inc
www.design-intelligence.com <http://www.design-intelligence.com> 


	----------
	From:  David Megginson [SMTP:david at megginson.com]
	Sent:  Monday, May 17, 1999 9:55 AM
	To:  XML Developers' List
	Subject:  re: Letting well-formedness slip: was A milestone in XML

	Jonathan Eisenzopf writes:

	 > Of course, Matt's correct and I don't think we should back down
on
	 > pressing the issue. It does beg the question, what to do with
older
	 > parsers and XML files? Check the declaration before parsing or
just
	 > ignore and let it fail? As long as it's not built into the parser
	 > one can easily handle the uppercase declarations.

	(I'm not certain that it begs the question, but it certainly raises
	it.)

	Fortunately, there *are* no old versions of XML -- there's nothing
but
	XML 1.0 out there, and the people in the W3C's XML Activity have
	(amazingly, for standards writers) resisted the very strong
temptation
	to fiddle with it for well over a year, now.

	In other words, the problem is how to convert something that is
*not*
	XML (such as CDF, HTML 4.0, TeX, RTF, etc.) to XML.  Since CDF has
	strong similarities to XML, a little Perl might do the trick, but it
	is important to note that CDF is not XML, and since client-side push
	is a double-plus-ungood-stock-price-sinking-dirty-nasty word, I'd be
	surprised if anyone bothered to make it into XML now (people seldom
	enjoy maintaining their failures).

	Now, if there were an XML 1.1, an XML 2.0, etc., we'd have
	version-management problems: it is hard to build a market on a spec
	that is constantly changing.  Fortunately, there's nothing out there
	but XML 1.0, and it turns out to be good enough, warts and all.


	All the best,


	David

	-- 
	David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
	           http://www.megginson.com/

	xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post,
mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
	Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
	To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
	(un)subscribe xml-dev
	To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following
message;
	subscribe xml-dev-digest
	List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list