SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation

[Miles Sabin]

Err ... I might be losing my sanity here, but I
_thought_ I'd posted a description of a technique that
allows us to have the best of all worlds (forwards and 
backwards compatibility with new methods added to 
Parser, and no ugly casting or catching of
NoSuchMethodErrors) in my last contribution to the
'Parser2 considered harmful' thread,

http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9905/0425.html

Didn't it propagate? Didn't it make sense? I'd be
happy to elaborate if it wasn't all that clear.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                          Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect           5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230                  London, W6 0LJ
msabin at cromwellmedia.co.uk           England

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)