simonstl at simonstl.com
Fri May 21 05:06:11 BST 1999
At 06:37 PM 5/20/99 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
>There's a new issue up over at XML.com which highlights an argument that's
>been going on here and there in private, but never heretofore in public:
>Is XSL a good idea?
Daggers have been out on the XSL-list on this issue for a good long time.
(See the archives at http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list for too many
details.) Hakon Wium Lie's "Formatting Objects Considered Harmful"
(http://www.operasoftware.com/people/howcome/1999/foch.html) kicked off
about two weeks of fairly explosive debate about a month ago, but these
issues have been simmering for a long while.
It's wonderful to see XML.com publishing controversial articles, especially
ones whose viewpoint I happen to share. ;-)
(Oops, I used a smiley. Haven't done that in a long time!)
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (June)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev