Weighing in on XSL / Standards
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Mon May 24 17:12:38 BST 1999
David Megginson wrote:
[statement that XSL is "at least two orders of magnitude more
complicated" than CSS1]
Gak, what a thought. Can we really use tools that differ by
a complexity of 100 from other tools? Consider the idea of
a programming language 100 times simpler than C, or 100 times
more complex than Standard C++. Can the mind really grasp
such a thing?
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev