Web Resource Identity

[Jerome McDonough]

At 01:01 PM 6/28/1999 -0500, Paul Prescod wrote:
>Jerome McDonough wrote:
>> 
>>Two different
>> URNs may refer to the same abstract work, and retrieve the same or
different
>> physical manifestations depending on the work identified, context of the
>> resolver,
>> etc.  When you have two URNs identifying an abstract concept, I don't see
>> how you can reliably determine computationally that they both identify the
>> same thing.  
>
>Why can't you just ask the server? "I've got these two URNs. What's the
>Unique ID of the thing that they refer to?"

Well, you've already got two unique identifiers for an abstract work.  For
a server
to know whether or not those identifiers identify the *same* abstract work,
either someone's going to have to established a linking database somewhere 
mapping the two together (not a requirement of any of the URN architecture
proposals and shouldn't be) or your server is going to have to see what
the identifiers resolve to, and try to make a determination based on that
whether the URNs identify the same thing.  But relying on the latter is truly
ugly and unreliable.  And I honestly don't anticipate too many people going
to the effort of the former.


Jerome McDonough -- jmcdonou at library.Berkeley.EDU  |  (......)
Library Systems Office, 386 Doe, U.C. Berkeley     |  \ *  * /
Berkeley, CA 94720-6000    (510) 642-5168          |  \  <>  /
"Well, it looks easy enough...."                   |   \ -- /  SGNORMPF!!!
         -- From the Famous Last Words file        |    ||||

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)