Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
jborden at mediaone.net
Mon May 31 17:33:39 BST 1999
Paul Hunter wrote:
> Using HTTP for URIs sounds intrinsically <em>bad</em> to me. ...
Aside from the evident fact that such practice goes against several
individial's internal sense of what is 'right' or 'wrong', this is the only
criticism I see of this practice. No one has offered a hard or practical
example of an actual problem this creates, aside from offending of the
> Suppose we
> change that URI to something more like:
> (Just because most companies' web space may not be as tightly administered
> as the W3C's...) What happens when my web administrator decides to put a
> default web page there, which happens to be a page about his cat Mittens?
> Apart from the facetiousness of this example, we have the potential of the
> same URI pointing to two completely different resources; I
> thought this was
> not supposed to happen with URIs.
Okay, suppose this happens... when the URI is being used as a namespace, no
attempt is made to resolve the URL, and resolution of the URL has no meaning
in terms of namespaces, so ... no problem.
A namespace URI does not point to a resource. The URI is used only as a
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev