XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Arnold, Curt]

Dave Winer wrote:
>>
>>Yes yes yes!!
>>
>>That would get XML into the minds of HTML coders and would start a process
>>for other applications of XML to take off.
>>
>>Dave

After ranting on application profiles, etc.  I wanted to clarify that it
doesn't seem to be necessary to get an answer to application profiles for
XHTML to be useful.  Application profiles would be a useful thing to have
resolved for other XML applications, but doesn't seem necessary for XHTML
1.0.  The three namespaces thing seemed to be adding a feature to XHTML 1.0
that HTML 4.01 did not have.  As a new feature, it should have probably been
reserved for XHTML 1.1 or whatever.  

Namespace free XHTML would be fine with me.  However, if XHTML must deal
with application profiles, I'd like it to establish a pattern that other xml
applications could follow.  However, I think that is better left to the
schema group (and maybe to XML Schema 1.1)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)