XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Jelks Cabaniss]

Don Park wrote:

> I don't see much difference between zero and one (one?:) namespace
> and since there is definite need for a namespace (i.e. XSL) to
> distinguish (X)HTML tags from others, I prefer one over zero.

XSL currently handles HTML, text, and XML 1.0 output without need for any
specified namespace in either the input or the output.

/Jelks


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)