XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Simon St.Laurent]

At 05:08 PM 11/3/99 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>So XHTML needs a namespace, and the HTML WG is the correct group to assign 
>it.  Whether they want to do it as part of the XHTML 1.0 spec or simply as
>a 3-line W3C recommendation published separately makes little 
>difference. -Tim

Except that the second route probably would have gotten XHTML 1.0 through
without these hitches.  Technically, you're quite right.  Politically, I
think this could have been easier.

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)