XHTML 1.0 returned to HTML WG

[Don Park]

Paul,

I think we should wrap up this thread here (with a Duck Tape :).

<IMHO>
There is zero chance of the three line spec happening whether it
makes sense or not.  There is also zero chance of us convincing
each other one way another.  It would have been a nice continuing
conversation piece over drinks but I can't send liquior through
XML-DEV's attachment restrictions.  Oh, well.
</IMHO>

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)