w.hedley at auckland.ac.nz
Tue Nov 9 21:58:06 GMT 1999
Len Bullard wrote:
> Good approach. Question: is it a valid subset? Will any instance that
> parses by this definition parse with the original?
I'm 99% confident that anything conforming to this DTD would also conform
to the DocBook DTD - I certainly didn't add anything new, just ripped out
the bits that seemed useful. I'm less confident that a DocBook bibliography
would validate against my DTD - there may well be some features missing.
> How should an XML DTD designer signify that this DTD is a
> conformant subset or a variant of a another DTD?
Good commenting ;-)
> Are these one, two, or three namespaces IF a namespace identifier
> resolves to a schema? This matters if the FPI is ROA for the
> DTD and a label for the namespace identifier.
Too many acronyms for my taste (and limited experience with namespaces),
Department of Engineering Science
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev