Is the XML decl a PI ?

[Tim Bray]

At 01:49 AM 11/14/99 -0000, Richard Anderson wrote:
>> It is not a "processing instruction"!  It is a *declaration*!
>
>The XML declaration is an indication to the application processing the
>document as to what version of the XML spec the following markup conforms
>to, what encoding is used, and whether or not there are dependancies of
>external entites within the document.  

This is true.

But it's my opinion that the XML decl is *not* a PI, for three reasons:

 - it doesn't match production [17] because the target is 'xml'
 - it doesn't match sections [22] and [27], which says that a PI
   can only occur in the space starting *after* the XML declaration
 - section 2.6 says "Processing instructions (PIs) allow documents to 
   contain instructions for applications. ".  The XML decl contains 
   instructions for the XML processor which is carefully distinguished
   from an application

But I think the spec probably should have had an explicit statement
saying that the XML decl either is or isn't a PI, because it admittedly
kind of walks, swims, and quacks like one. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)