About templates

[Leigh Dodds]

> I am now leaning very heavily toward focusing SML on XML fragments
> so that SML data (the word 'document' is not in the SML draft spec)
> starts with the 'content' production rule of the XML spec.  No
> prolog, no misc.  SML data have zero or more elements and can be
> entirely text.

I assume you mean the following? 

[43] content ::= (element | CharData | Reference | CDSect | PI | Comment)*

So an SML data fragment is not necessarily a valid XML document 
as it can be entirely text? And so an XML processor may not be 
able to process an SML document? Is that correct?

> May your tire pressure remain constant,

And your mileage never vary :)

L.

==================================================================
    "Never Do With More, What Can Be Achieved With Less"
				---William of Occam
==================================================================
Leigh Dodds                             Eml:  ldodds at ingenta.com
ingenta ltd                             Tel:  +44 1225 826619
BUCS Building, University of Bath       Fax:  +44 1225 826283

HomePage :				 	http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccslrd/
WebLog   :			     http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic/
==================================================================

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)