SGML, XML and SML

[Sean McGrath]

At 07:35 PM 11/20/99 +0800, you wrote:
> From: Don Park <donpark at docuverse.com>
>
> >
>>FYI, SML does not have the three problems.  It is just hairless XML.
>
>Well, it is not XML at all if  it miss-parses a well-formed XML
>document.
>
Ah, but as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong SML guys),
the idea is to make SML an "application profile" of XML 1.0.

Any SML doc is an XML doc but not the other way around.

	SML < XML < SGML


regards,

<Sean uri="http://www.digitome.com/sean.html">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
<uri>http://www.www9.org</uri>
</Sean>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)