Feeling good about SML

[Jelks Cabaniss]

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> But why this endless "not invented here" desire to reinvent XML. It is
> still a mystery too me.  The complication in the XML world is not XML
> 1.0, but namespaces 

Amen!

> (which means that an element names may mean
> different things in different contexts) and class-based schemas (which
> can mean that even within a namespace a name may mean different things
> depending on context).  Anyone who thought DTDs were hard may be in for
> a shock unless we are careful!

Isn't that water already under the bridge?


/Jelks


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)