Don Park donpark at
Mon Nov 22 19:52:01 GMT 1999

Tim Bray wrote:
>And SML must not claim, explicitly or implicitly, to "be XML".

I think this condition can be met.  We will make it clear that:

SML is a subset of XML and is not to be considered, in any sense,
as conforming to the full XML 1.0 specification.

If you have better wordings, I'll be obliged.  It is not my
intention to sabotage XML in-flight.


Don Park    -   mailto:donpark at
Docuverse   -

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list