If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?

[James Robertson]

>
>"Anthony B. Coates" writes:
>
> > A thought that struck me (and probably struck many of you before me) is 
> that
> > the event stream from a SAX parser is much like the token stream from a 
> lexical
> > analyser, like 'lex'.  This made me wonder what the equivalent to 
> 'yacc' would
> > be in this picture;

I guess the closest thing I've seen is
Omnimark:

It's stream-based, event-driven, and maintains
a stack of open elements for you. It doesn't
build a whole in-memory representation of the
document either, unlike DOM.

Obviously I'm not saying it's identical
in concept, but in practice, it works well.

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr at steptwo.com.au

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)