[SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML

[Sean McGrath]

[Don Park]
>
>SML is a subset in the sense that it meets the
>external parsed entity requirements, XML fragments
>in other words.
>

An SML document will not be an XML 1.0 document.
No XML 1.0 parser can be used out-of-the box to
parse SML. Your use of "subset" here is
misleading.

I think this one crosses the rubicon. I have
high hopes for SML. *Please* make is truly
a subset of XML 1.0.

>>If I have understood you right then this
>>blows it for me I'm afraid:-(
>
>Sorry about that.
>
Likewise. Sigh. My first gut reaction is
to say "hey, I'll find some like-minded people
and do it myself and call it NBML - No Brainer
Markup Language - or something."  But this is the
rocky road to a faction fight. I don't
want to go there. I live close to one of those
that has been going  on for 300 years so
and I don't need another one.

*Please make SML truly a subset of XML 1.0*

regards,




<Sean uri="http://www.digitome.com/sean.html">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
<uri>http://www.www9.org</uri>
</Sean>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)