Forget SML. We need RTSML.

Mark Birbeck Mark.Birbeck at
Sun Nov 28 17:34:51 GMT 1999


I don't know why you're missing the obvious point, which is that there
is lot of programming overhead in allowing any tag to be used. It's also
very confusing for beginners. Far better to restrict the language to one

 	document ::= StartTag Stuff EndTag
 	StartTag ::= '<RTSML>'
 	EndTag   ::= '</RTSML>'

I was wondering why we couldn't have '/' as the end tag, if there is
only one, but I think that would weaken the error-chocking capabilities.

You also said:

> We expect RTSML 1.0 to be a WFeCes Recommendation on April 1, 
> 1999 or day after
> tomorrow (whichever comes first).

I assume this was a typong mistake; you surely mean in the 1st April,


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list