[SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?

Clark C. Evans clark.evans at manhattanproject.com
Sun Nov 28 19:44:29 GMT 1999

On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> S-XSLT should be written anyway. XT will hardly fit into 
> cell phone ;-)
> S-XSLT processor should be much easier to write than 
> it was to write XT ( the same is with SML parser, S-SAX, e t.c.):

I'm all for this; the SSLT definition should be
stream-only; in otherwords, it should not require 
random access to the entire SML stream.

;) Clark

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list