Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn at ebt.com
Sun Nov 28 21:35:39 GMT 1999
> There might be a case for keeping ID and IDREF, for
> example, as a minimal mechanism for linking inside a
> document, but many of the features of XML (notably
> entities) are pretty complex in their
> own right. An architecture that does away with these, significantly
> reducing the complexity of implementing "vanilla" XML, and requires
> implementation of (say) an additional XLink layer for
> applications that need to create references between documents, would seem
> to provide more, not less interoperability.
Only if people also implement XLink.... and XLink
itself is far from trivial.
In an ideal world, we'd have XML, XSLT, XLink, and maybe a
few others supported in all tools. The reality is that this
will likely never happen.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev