David Carlisle davidc at nag.co.uk
Tue Nov 30 15:05:38 GMT 1999

> I do not think it is superflous to allow ¤.

Given that this is defined to be the same as $ at the lowest level of xml
parsing, I can not see any reason why the arguments currently being
applied to get rid of attributes (which are nowhere nearly as closely
identified with the `equivalent' element markup) do not apply to this
case as well.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list