Dissillusioned about interoperability.

[Paul Prescod]

Steinar Bang wrote:
> 
> We're replacing our old lisp-oid format, parsed with a PCCTS recursive
> descent parser, with XML, based on a C++ SAX wrapper over expat.
> 
> And the handwritten state machine logic of the DocumentHandler feels
> like a step back from the EBNF specification of our old format.

If this is a problem then why are you using an event-handler based tool
instead of a tree tool? Or if you would prefer something in-between,
what do you have in mind?

 Paul Prescod

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)