Java Parser

[David Megginson]

David Brownell <david-b at pacbell.net> writes:

> > Ummmm...I need validation ! So, which one should it be ? TR2 or
> > XML4J ? Performance is an issue here !
> 
> Correctness should be too -- see my XML.com review.

True, but you need to divide the correctness question into two parts:

a) the parser accepts all well-formed/valid documents
b) the parser rejects all malformed/invalid documents

A parser that fails either of these is non-conforming; that said, you
probably care a lot more about (a) than (b) for light-weight clients.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)