SAX and URNs

[David Megginson]

"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl at simonstl.com> writes:

> Next question... do any XML parsers support URNs?  Do they use these
> resolution protocols?

Hmm -- this sounds like a really good candidate for a SAX conformance
test.  Make up an XML document that references a URN, then implement
an EntityResolver that maps the URN to a URL that actually points to
something.

SAX parsers shouldn't choke on this (even if they know nothing about
URNs), but I'm not willing to bet too much: I think that AElfred might
be OK, and James almost certain does it right in XT.

> URNs feel a lot like FPIs to me in terms of their resolvability and lack of
> infrastructure thereof, and I often wonder if they really belong mixed with
> URLs. Oh well.

Yeah, there's been a lot of discussion on this point.  By the way, do
we have any usable URN schemes yet?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)