XHTML & Schemas

[James Tauber]

> Actually, that's a real worry. After all, how would we know about such a
> decision except for its expression in the various drafts? So far, the
facts
> I'm aware of are consistent with the W3C deciding to go in the "namespace
==
> schema" way, and are inconsistent with any other interpretation.

Documents like

Web Architecture: Extensible Languages
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-webarch-extlang

and others at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ provide some good insight into
TimBL's thinking on these and related issues.

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber at jtauber.com / www.jtauber.com
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com,  www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
<pipe>Ceci n'est pas une pipe</pipe>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)