This is getting silly

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Fri Sep 3 01:04:40 BST 1999


All this rumor and innuendo is beside the point.  There is a body of
people called the HTML Working Group who made a set of decisions
reflected in the current XHTML 1.0 WD.  The fact that there were
substantial changes at the last moment is first of all not unprecedented,
secondly not surprising, and thirdly, not the issue here.

There are all sorts of honest grounds for disagreement on namespace
handling in XHTML 1.0, and they are worth investing technical debate in.  
The current wave of postings is just a waste of time.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)





More information about the Xml-dev mailing list