ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)

[James Tauber]

joubin wrote:
> James Tauber wrote:
> >Mind you, hierarchical organisation isn't that good a general solution as
it
> >forces you to prioritise axes.
>
> This is true only if you _must_ map an n-dim space (n>1) with a _single_
> hierarchy.  You can certainly map an n-dim space with n hierarchies, where
> the relationships between hierarchies are isomorphic to the relationships
of
> the dimension of space.

Wouldn't it be factorial in n?

If you wanted to check for XHTML 1.0 Strict, you'd have to match

http://www.w3.org/xhtml/1.0/Strict
http://www.w3.org/xhtml/Strict/1.0
http://www.w3.org/1.0/Strict/xhtml
http://www.w3.org/1.0/xhtml/Strict
http://www.w3.org/Strict/xhtml/1.0
http://www.w3.org/Strict/1.0/xhtml

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)