Mark.Birbeck at iedigital.net
Fri Sep 3 12:53:45 BST 1999
David Brownell wrote:
> Mark Birbeck wrote:
> > So, how else do you make the distinction? You can't use DTDs if the
> > XHTML is inside another doc - so what else?
> But "XHTML inside another doc" is the very combining of vocabularies
> (modularization etc) that XHTML 1.0 isn't intended to address.
I understand modularization (in the context of XHTML) to be the breaking
up XHTML into a number of modules - tables, lists, block text features,
scripts and so on.
I understand "XHTML inside another document" to be something different,
and is illustrated by the MathML example in the proposal. As with any
mixing of vocabularies in a document, it requires a namespace for each
vocabulary. XHTML 1.0 *is* intended to address that, although through no
fault of its own, it cannot create combined documents that can be
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev