an unfilled need
cbullard at hiwaay.net
Mon Sep 6 22:41:54 BST 1999
Matthew Gertner wrote:
> No one objected to the W3C controlling XML at the onset because it was far from a
> foregone conclusion that XML was win over a number of plausible (but in retrospect clearly
> inferior) approaches.
Yes some did. The XML effort hijacked an international standard by
it and putting the W3C trademark on it. The confidentiality rules of
and the singleton control of its policy ensured that this standard would
modified and shaped by and for the goals of the members of a
objected strenuously. As the twig is bent...
By the way, nice article, Jon. It says what namespaces are and aren't.
it ducks all of the issues the list is trying to address without
any leadership. Yes, tie XML to Java. If that gets applications out
the door and checks coming back, by all means, do that.
Now, the rest of you should decide what you want to use namespaces
for and just do it. You don't need permission and if you wait for it,
you only fall behind in development.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev