confidentiality in W3C WGs

[Lauren Wood]

On 7 Sep 99, at 11:15, Ronald Bourret wrote:

> I've only briefly been following this whole discussion, but I don't think 
> anybody has asked for names of who wanted one namespace and who wanted 
> three and who wanted the discussion to simply end because they were late 
> for a flight.

I agree that technical reasons for why the spec is the way it is, and 
reasons for change, should be made public. Particularly when the 
issue is controversial, as this one is. 


Lauren

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)