ANN: XML and Databases article

[Ronald Bourret]

Ken MacLeod wrote:

> What more are you expecting?  If we were to say that groves provide
> all the same functions you attribute to the XML world but without
> being tied to XML specifically, wouldn't that alone be worthwhile?

It wasn't a matter of expectations or whether groves are worthwhile -- they 
certainly seem to be.  I'm just curious what capabilities are available and 
if there's anything obvious I'm missing, in the sense that SAX might be 
obvious to someone who's worked with XML for a while, but not to a 
newcomer.

> Note that in many cases, the tools and specs for working with XML can
> easily be adapted to work with groves.

So my question still stands: which of these capabilities are there today? 
That is, which linking / querying / navigating / whatever specs have 
already been designed to work with groves and for which of these are there 
tools today?

-- Ron Bourret


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)