CNET on XHTML

[David Brownell]

"Hunter, David" wrote:
> 
> From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:Daniel.Veillard at w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 5:14 AM
> 
> <snip/>
> > I guess Ann
> > and other members of that working group did explain the reasons of
> > their technical decision.
> <snip/>
> 
> Let me just echo Simon St. Laurent:
> 
> No.  We have no reason.  We have nothing.

Aye -- nothing.  An "official" W3C rationale is still lacking;
odd since this decision seems to fly in the face of the clear
intent of the XML namespaces spec.

"A html:rose is a strict:rose is a frameset:rose ... "

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)