Unicode surrogate block in XML?

Paul W. Abrahams abrahams at valinet.com
Fri Sep 17 00:06:56 BST 1999


The XML 1.0 spec explicitly excludes the Unicode surrogate characters
from XML documents (production 2).  It now seems, from information
I've picked up on the Unicode web site, that surrogate characters are
likely to play a more important role in the future, since the
available 16-bit characters are almost all used up.  (Unicode 2.0 has
18,134 spares but Unicode 3.0 has only 7827 spares.  The trend is
clear.)

Is any thought being given in W3C to allowing surrogate characters in
XML documents?

Paul Abrahams



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)





More information about the Xml-dev mailing list