Another look at namespaces
ann at webgeek.com
Sat Sep 18 03:09:23 BST 1999
At 05:58 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald at Design-Intelligence.com wrote:
>> At 03:24 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald at Design-Intelligence.com wrote:
>> >. In particular, why should XHTML
>> >go off and decide a mechanism to solve a problem which is a general XML
>> >problem and is being worked on by the schema group?
>> We didn't decide someone else's problem. We took a work in progress and
>> used it as the basis of *one* aspect (out of several) for our decision on
>> the namespace issue.
>> But that is jumping the gun - part of a work in progress is in a proposed
The key phrase in there is "one aspect" -- and we're still not *using*
schemas, we're addressing the possibility that this may happen, as well as
dealing with the other use cases described in Steven's message.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev