my XSLT equipment

[Brandt Dainow]

I have to disagree. I think the schema format is MUCH worse to work with. It
is overly long (and a drag to code) and adds nothing of value over DTD's.
I'll ignore the fact it is not finished and unstable.

Brandt Dainow
bd at internet-etc.com
Internet Etc Ltd
http://www.internet-etc.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-xml-dev at ic.ac.uk [mailto:owner-xml-dev at ic.ac.uk]On
>Behalf Of
>Jean Marc VANEL
>Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 10:39 AM
>To: xml-dev-ig%PMDF%MHMAIL at mr.effix.fr; xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
>Subject: RE: my XSLT equipment
>
>
>
>
>Translation XML Schema --> DTD
>
>Lots of tools need a DTD, but the  XML Schema is a better
>format to work with (though not completely stable).
>
>A solution is to generate a DTD from the XML Schema using a
>XSLT stylesheet.
>This is simple light-weight solution, and I maintain that you
>don't have to depend on big tools like XML Authority to do this.
>
>Anyone willing to share code for this XSLT stylesheet ?
>
>Jean-Marc
>
>
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post,
mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions and unsubscriptions
are  now ***CLOSED*** in preparation for list transfer to OASIS.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions and unsubscriptions
are  now ***CLOSED*** in preparation for list transfer to OASIS.