SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException?
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans at manhattanproject.com
Mon Jan 3 18:02:07 GMT 2000
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, David Brownell wrote:
> "Clark C. Evans" wrote:
> > I guess I'm trying to say that a data format
> > exception in one context could easily be seen
> > as an I/O exception in another context.
> Actually, everything boils down to an EINVAL at
> some level ... everything else is just varying
> layers of sugar to explain what was INVAL ! ;-)
Yes. And the detail of such sugar should depend
upon the task being performed.
A SAX parser is not a library of functions each performing
distinct granular and possibly recoverable operations.
Rather, a SAX parser is a processing component which takes
an XML input source and generates an event stream as output.
It's internal workings are encapsulated -- it does not expose
highly granular control of its process. Thus, possible
automated recover schemes are (understandably) rather limited.
Therefore, it seems perfectly acceptable for the error to be
generic. Further, if you consider the SAX parser's primary
task, that of converting an input source to an output stream,
of the generic errors, IOException seems the best fit.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev