SAX2 Namespace Support

[David Megginson]

John Aldridge <john.aldridge at informatix.co.uk> writes:

> I'm sorry, I don't see the problem.  The QNames are equal if ns() and
> name() both match.  The prefix is irrelevant.  This is what I suggested in
> my definition of the equality operator above.
> 
>     if (qn1 == qn2) ...
> 
> just does the right thing.  If some application really wants to compare the
> prefixed name, it can always write:
> 
>     if (qn1.prefixedName () == qn2.prefixedName ()) ...
> 
> I'm obviously missing something, since you and other knowledgable people
> don't regard this as self evidently obvious -- can you explain the problem
> to me, please?

In principle (the principle of least surprise), it's very bad
behaviour for two objects to be == in C++ or equals() in Java if any
of their publicly-accessible fields differ.  Think of sets, for
example.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)