SAX2: Which license?
david-b at pacbell.net
Tue Jan 11 04:32:11 GMT 2000
Paul Prescod wrote:
> If this is worth doing then the way I would propose to do it would
> be to tie the trademark to a test suite.
Which is what Sun is doing with its standard extensions; there's
at least one precedent beyond POSIX certification.
FWIW I'm more than willing to hear about issues people may have in
the SAX-1.0/XML-1.0 test harness I've written (on my XML page),
and would be interested in any enhancements folk have that can
promote SAX-2.0 conformance testing.
Fair notice: those aren't the only standards that'll be involved
in such work. And of course, since it's Open Source it can be used
without my active involvement too. (Though I'd love to hear about
it before anyone starts!)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev