Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
simonstl at simonstl.com
Sat Jan 15 18:58:41 GMT 2000
At 10:22 AM 1/15/00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>James Clark wrote:
>> Microsoft is right on this one. See
>Hmm, errata updated (previous 2/17/1999) ... YESTERDAY!!
Wow. That's enormous. My old copy of the errata was 7K, and this is 31K.
As much as I appreciate that the W3C is busy, getting this out a lot
earlier would have been useful, to say the least. A lot of the dates on
these are _very_ old.
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
More information about the Xml-dev